Google sells its soul, and ours

Sidney Morning Herald February 4, 2006

The search engine’s subservience to China puts its users everywhere at risk, writes Frida Ghitis.

A FEW years ago, I walked into an internet room in Tibet’s capital, Lhasa. There were no Chinese soldiers in the room and no visible government censors nearby. A sign on the wall, however, reminded users that China’s all-seeing eye had not disappeared. “Do not use internet,” the warning instructed, “for any political or other unintelligent purposes.”

Since then, China’s ruling regime has perfected the science of controlling what the Chinese can read or write on the internet to such a degree it has become the envy of tyrants the world over. We might have expected that from a regime that has proved it will do whatever it takes to stay in power. What we never expected was to see Google, the company whose motto is “Don’t be evil”, helping in the effort.

Google’s decision to help China censor searches on the company’s new Chinese website is not only a violation of its own righteous-sounding principles, and it’s not just an affront to those working to bring international standards of human rights to the Chinese people. No, Google’s sell-out to Beijing is also a threat to every person who ever used Google.

That’s no exaggeration. Google saves every search, every email, every fingerprint we leave on the web when we move through its search engine, its Gmail service or its internet offerings. Google knows more about us than the FBI or the CIA or any spy agency of any government. And nobody regulates it. When a company that holds digital dossiers on millions of people decides profits are more important than principles, we are all at risk.

Google will take part in a censorship program whose implications, according to Harvard’s Berkman Centre for Internet and Society, “are profound and disturbing”. The Chinese Government blocks thousands upon thousands of search terms – including “censorship”.

To be fair, Google is hardly alone in capitulating to Beijing’s rulers to gain a web share of China’s 1.3 billion inhabitants. The tantalising market has tested the ethics of many a Western corporation and most have failed. That is particularly true in the internet business.

Just last year, Yahoo helped Beijing’s web goons track down the identity of a Chinese journalist who wrote an email about the anniversary of the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre of Chinese democracy advocates. The journalist, Shi Tao, was sentenced to 10 years in prison. Reporters Without Borders labelled Yahoo an “informant” that “collaborated enthusiastically” with the Chinese regime. Microsoft, too, plays by the regime’s rules. Bloggers on MSN’s Chinese service cannot search words such as “democracy” or “freedom”. Internet users in China cannot read or write about anything that even hints of opposition to the Communist Party. Even pro-Western commentary can trigger a block. Chinese bloggers, incidentally, must all register and identify themselves to authorities.

The often-stated desire to “do good” and make the world a better place was one of the traits that endeared Google to the public. It was one of the reasons we trusted it to guard the valuable contents of the company’s thousands of servers. Now Google has become a company like all others, with an eye on the bottom line before anything else. The company has decided to help China’s censors even as it fights a request for records from the US Justice Department. Sceptics had claimed Google was resisting the request to protect its technology, rather than to protect users’ privacy. That explanation sounds more plausible than ever.

We’ve long known about China’s disdain for individual freedoms. But it’s Google, it seems, we hardly knew. It’s time to rethink that Gmail account and demand some safeguards from a potentially dangerous company. Perhaps we, too, need to heed the Tibetan cybercafe warning: “Do not use internet for any political or unintelligent purposes.”


6 thoughts on “Google sells its soul, and ours”

  1. Some dialog is better than no dialog, I would think. Democratic ideas have been pervading China for decades. Chinese people read well between the lines.

  2. Note 1: To What Dialogue are you referring, Ms. Doyle?

    Google had a choice. Had Google refused to lend its technological power to the Chinese dictatorship, it could have made a powerful statement. Google is a fantastically successful company, its owners and stockholders are FLUSH with millions. In fact, I believe that the founders of Google are billionairs (with a “B”). They made a conscious and knowing choice, for the sake of MORE MONEY, to give technological power to one of the worst dictatorships in the world. There isn’t enough buttercream frosting in the world, to cover the heap of rotting garbage this decision represents.

    Google could have encouraged those who seek intellectual freedom in China by publicly refusing to empower the Chinese Communists. What is heartbreaking is that Google has handed over probably the most sophisticated tool for the control of thought available today. Please don’t offer up, the standard limp rationalization of “dialogue.” There is no “dialogue” here Ms. Doyle. This entire post is about the SUPPRESSION OF DIALOGUE: dialogue among the Chinese people. They cannot freely discuss the affairs of their own country. Would you enjoy living under that regimen, Ms. Doyle? You don’t seem to mind it for the Chinese.

  3. Mickey Spiegel, senior researcher in the Asia division of Human Rights Watch (blocked by Google and Yahoo but not Microsoft), said was “a step backwards in terms of freedom of expression issues.”

    “It will leave the Chinese populace with less and less ability to, in a sense, think for themselves about some of the issues facing them today,” Spiegel said. “They are going to have a restricted diet of info, and that is going to color how they view the world. It’s a big story, and it’s a stain on their image.”

    It really is ironic that Google wants to feel free to censor content when it suits their business purposes, yet they squawk loudly when the phone companies bring up the notion of throttling bandwidth. You can’t condone censorship — even tacitly — and expect to be taken seriously when it comes to Internet neutrality. Google Corporate slogan just may in fact come back to haunt them on this and a wide range of other issues.

  4. Google can’t have it both ways: refuse compliance with the US government but cave to China’s. There is no consistency here.

  5. U.S. Government was looking for child porn rings

    The United States government was asking Google to help it with locating child porn rings. Google was ABOVE stooping to this activity, but, it would actively assist the Chinese government in ferreting out Chinese who wish to discuss their own political affairs without the supervision of the government. What a bunch.

Comments are closed.