{"id":7784,"date":"2012-05-04T06:47:07","date_gmt":"2012-05-04T13:47:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/?p=7784"},"modified":"2012-05-06T06:51:05","modified_gmt":"2012-05-06T13:51:05","slug":"without-justice-what-else-is-the-state-but-a-great-band-of-robbers-st-augustine","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/2012\/05\/without-justice-what-else-is-the-state-but-a-great-band-of-robbers-st-augustine\/","title":{"rendered":"Without Justice, What Else is the State But a Great Band of Robbers &#8211; St. Augustine"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright size-full wp-image-7785\" title=\"St_Augustine_01_250px\" src=\"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/05\/St_Augustine_01_250px.jpg\" alt=\"St. Augustine Without Justice State is a Great Band of Robbers\" width=\"250\" height=\"200\" hspace=\"5\" \/> by Andrew M. Greenwell, Esq. &#8211;<br \/>\nIn his book <em>City of God<\/em>, St. Augustine famously said, &#8220;without justice, what else is the State but a great band of robbers?&#8221;\u00a0 This statement seems to be a favorite of Pope Benedict XVI, and he has recruited it in warning lawmakers, particularly lawmakers in the Western nations with Christian heritage, of the way to which they are headed.<\/p>\n<p>He\u00a0referred to these words in his address to the German Parliament or <em>Bundestag <\/em>when he visited Germany.\u00a0 Some years earlier, in his encyclical <em>Deus caritas est<\/em>, Pope Benedict XVI referred to those very same words.<\/p>\n<p>It is useful from time to time to recall these words of St. Augustine and the deep truth that they convey. <!--more--><\/p>\n<p>In his encyclical <em>Deus caritas est<\/em>, Pope Benedict elaborated on St. Augustine&#8217;s famous saying.\u00a0 The reason why St. Augustine insisted on justice is that &#8220;justice is both the aim and the intrinsic criterion of all politics.&#8221;\u00a0 (No. 28).\u00a0 <\/p>\n<p>The negative implication of this statement is that without justice, politics&#8211;and the law promulgated by the political processs&#8211;is aimless and has no criterion.\u00a0 In short, it is lawless, and being lawless, unjust.<\/p>\n<p>To say that politics and law are aimless and have no criterion, is the same thing as saying that politics and law are unreasonable and arbitrary.\u00a0 All politics and all law therefore become relative and unhinged from moral law.\u00a0 This view of politics and law takes us from freedom&#8211;which is the liberty to do as we ought&#8211;past the threshold of justice into tyranny&#8211;where we are no longer free to do as we ought, but we must do what we&#8217;re told.<\/p>\n<p>By definition, tyranny exists when politics or law is arbitrary.\u00a0 In such a case, might makes right, whereas it ought to be the other way around: right&#8211;that is to say, justice&#8211;makes might.<\/p>\n<p>Politics and law must then be informed by right, by justice.\u00a0 It is an absolutely essential requirement that politics and law have justice behind them, otherwise we are ruled by thug government.<\/p>\n<p>In politics, as in lawmaking, it is essential to focus on justice.<\/p>\n<p>Justice, as the <em>Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church <\/em>makes clear, has both subjective and objective components.<\/p>\n<p>But we ought not to be confused by the term &#8220;subjective.&#8221;\u00a0 The term &#8220;subjective&#8221; does not mean whatever we want, or feel, or desire (which is how we ordinarily use the term).\u00a0 In saying that justice has a subjective component, the Church is hardly advocating a politics of desire.<\/p>\n<p>The term subjective as understood by the Church within the context of justice means that we ought to have the firm and constant resolve &#8220;to recognize the other as a person.&#8221;\u00a0 (<em>Compendium<\/em>, No. 201)\u00a0 In other words, the term subjective in the context of justice (and politics and law) means not the I, not the ego, but rather the other, the you, the <em>su<\/em>, the <em>tu<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>(It is indicative of the self-focused, individualistic nature of our society that the 1st person singular personal pronoun &#8220;I&#8221;-in Greek and Latin <em>ego<\/em>-has become a common word in English, but the 2nd person singular personal pronoun &#8220;you&#8221;-in Greek, <em>su<\/em>, in Latin, <em>tu<\/em>-is never heard at all.\u00a0 The word egoism is common; the word tuism is used only by grammarians, and not modern jurists.\u00a0 But egoism has nothing to do with justice; tuism has everything to do with justice.\u00a0 The only word we have is &#8220;altruism&#8221; which is derived from the word <em>alter <\/em>or &#8220;other,&#8221; but that has a sense of the anonymous or generic other, and not the familiar <em>su <\/em>or <em>tu<\/em>.)<\/p>\n<p>Not only then is justice entirely other directed, it is also based upon objective moral reality, the moral what is.\u00a0 Therefore, justice must include &#8220;decisive criteria of morality in the intersubjective and social sphere.&#8221;\u00a0 (<em>Compendium<\/em>, No. 201)<\/p>\n<p>The &#8220;decisive criteria of morality&#8221; are found in the natural moral law.\u00a0 The natural moral law has some &#8220;unchanging moral truths&#8221; from which we derive our inalienable rights, such as those relating to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.\u00a0 No politics, no law can ever trespass these without rank injustice.<\/p>\n<p>As the Pope in January of this year told the American bishops in their <em>ad limina <\/em>visit to Rome, the reality of these &#8220;unchanging moral truths&#8221; is the &#8220;key to human happiness and social prospering.&#8221;\u00a0 To ignore them, to supplant them, to violate them is not liberty, not justice, but rather its opposite: for it is to build a society and a politics based upon &#8220;reductionist and totalitarian readings of the human person and the nature of society.&#8221;\u00a0 This necessarily leads to injustice.<\/p>\n<p>In short, justice means the firm and constant resolve to recognize the other as a person, and to give him his due, all within the constraints of the natural moral law.<\/p>\n<p>To the extent any government fails to recognize anyone as a person-such as happened in our former laws allowing human chattel slavery which were abrogated by the 13th and 14th Amendments after a sanguinary war-it is nothing but a band of robbers, because the politics and law in not recognizing a person as a person has failed in its aim and criterion of subjective justice.<\/p>\n<p>Likewise, to the extent any government that trespasses the natural law-such as is happening now by the legal protection given abortion, or the legal recognition given homosexual &#8220;marriage&#8221;-it is nothing but a band of robbers because it has forgotten the aim and criterion of politics objective justice.<\/p>\n<p>What all of this means, of course, is that St. Augustine and Pope Benedict XVI are telling us that justice is outside politics and outside human law.\u00a0 Something that is politically or legally expedient&#8211;even if it is the will of the majority&#8211;is not necessarily just.\u00a0 Justice is something that hovers outside or above politics and law, that is extra-political or extra-legal or, perhaps better, supra-political or supra-legal.\u00a0 Politics and law that are based upon nothing other than agreement is rudderless politics, rudderless law, and it quickly falls into something gravely evil.<\/p>\n<p>As Catholics&#8211;indeed, all humans of good will regardless of religious confession&#8211;we must not cooperate in any effort to remove an objective aim and criterion of politics and of law.\u00a0 To do so would, in the words of Cardinal Ratzinger at the Mass prior to his election as Pope, be &#8220;building a dictatorship of relativism that does not recognize anything as definitive and whose ultimate goal consists solely of one&#8217;s own ego and desires.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Justice cannot be guilt on <em>egoism<\/em>, which is what the secularists wish to do.\u00a0 It must be built on <em>tuism <\/em>and the natural moral law.\u00a0 Anything less is to be ruled by a band of robbers.<\/p>\n<p>The American Jesuit John Courtney Murray stated that accepting a secularistic notion of democracy-such as what is proposed by many modern political philosophies including the regnant one-would result in the dismantling of the &#8220;noble, many storied mansion of democracy,&#8221; and would level it &#8220;to the dimensions of a flat majoritarianism, which is no mansion but a barn, perhaps even a tool shed in which the weapons of tyranny may be formed.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>If we allow ourselves to be ruled by a politics without justice, a politics that does not recognize the rights of persons and the natural law, then we will be ruled by a band of robbers, and we invariably will turn our &#8220;noble, many storied mansion of democracy&#8221; into a tool shed where the robbers pound out the weapons of their tyranny-laws of inhuman steel.<\/p>\n<p>We will live in a toolshed, subject to thiefdom.<\/p>\n<p>HT: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.catholic.org\/politics\/story.php?id=44847\" target=\"_blank\">Catholic Online<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>by Andrew M. Greenwell, Esq. &#8211; In his book City of God, St. Augustine famously said, &#8220;without justice, what else is the State but a great band of robbers?&#8221;\u00a0 This statement seems to be a favorite of Pope Benedict XVI, and he has recruited it in warning lawmakers, particularly lawmakers in the Western nations with &#8230; <a title=\"Without Justice, What Else is the State But a Great Band of Robbers &#8211; St. Augustine\" class=\"read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/2012\/05\/without-justice-what-else-is-the-state-but-a-great-band-of-robbers-st-augustine\/\" aria-label=\"Read more about Without Justice, What Else is the State But a Great Band of Robbers &#8211; St. Augustine\">Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":497,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"generate_page_header":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[68,142,15,35],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7784","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-christianity","category-leftist-tyranny","category-moral-issues","category-philosophy"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7784","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/497"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7784"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7784\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7784"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7784"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7784"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}