![\"Canada](\"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/02\/Canda_Christian_Persecution_01_240x160.jpg\" "\\"Canda_Christian_Persecution_01_240x160\\"")
by LifeSiteNews Editors –\nThe great English writer G.K. Chesterton once wrote: \u201cThe family is the test of freedom; because the family is the only thing that the free man makes for himself and by himself.\u201d<\/p>\n
by LifeSiteNews Editors –
\nThe great English writer G.K. Chesterton once wrote: \u201cThe family is the test of freedom; because the family is the only thing that the free man makes for himself and by himself.\u201d<\/p>\n
But if what Chesterton says is true, then Canada fails the test, because the Canadian family is no longer free.<\/p>\n
In the past week we have witnessed the Supreme Court of Canada dismiss the appeal<\/a> of a Quebec family for permission to exempt their child from that province\u2019s controversial ethics and religious culture course,<\/a> which critics say is \u201crelativistic,\u201d and teaches that all religious are equally valid. And we have heard a spokesperson for the Alberta education minister state<\/a> that under the province\u2019s new Education Act even homeschooling parents will no longer be allowed to teach their children traditional Christian sexual ethics. <\/p>\n These two developments come amidst the ongoing efforts<\/a> of the Ontario government to impose their \u201cequity\u201d program, \u201cdiversity\u201d curriculum, and transparently ideological \u201canti-bullying\u201d bill on all schools \u2013 whether Catholic or public. Already the largest school board in the province has said that parents will not be permitted<\/a> to exempt their children from parts of the curriculum they deem unacceptable.<\/p>\n It is perhaps ironic that this has happened at the same time that the Canadian Parliament voted a second time<\/a> to repeal the country\u2019s much-ballyhooed Section 13 \u201cHate Crimes\u201d provision, which has been used to drag conservatives and Christians through lengthy and expensive \u201chuman rights\u201d proceedings for nothing more than publicly speaking opinions that someone else deemed \u201coffensive.\u201d<\/p>\n But while the Canadian Human Rights Commission may soon no longer be able to use Section 13 as the club to beat politically incorrect Christians into submission, or at the very least into silence, the Canadian provinces are doing their very best simply to make sure there won\u2019t be any more such Christians in the first place. Mandatory \u201cdiversity\u201d education imposed on all schools, including home schools, without parental right to opt out is the chosen method to achieve this goal.<\/p>\n But those who care about freedom and democracy must call out and oppose this effort for what it is \u2013 tyranny.<\/p>\n While even conservative commentators are urging caution<\/a> in the interpretation of last week\u2019s Supreme Court ruling, which was narrow in scope and not the final word on the Quebec course, what is certain is that the decision, whether intentionally or not, has already sent a booming message across Canada: namely, that the authority to educate children comes from the state, and not from parents. The decision leaves the distinct impression that the state is no longer in loco<\/em> (in the place of) parentis<\/em>, but is<\/em> the parent, and holds the final say in matters of education.<\/p>\n While the justices demurred from deciding with finality whether the Quebec course violates the parents\u2019 ability to transmit their faith to their child, because there was insufficient information about the course and its content entered into evidence to make that decision, this reasoning ignores the central point: namely, that it doesn\u2019t matter<\/em> whether the court thinks the course really harms the parents\u2019 ability to raise their child in the faith. The important thing is that the parents<\/em> think it does.<\/p>\n In saying that it needs more proof that the course harms the parents\u2019 rights in this way, the court is implicitly saying that it doesn\u2019t believe the parents, and might very well know better than them. But it should be obvious that the parents, and not the court, are in a far better position to say whether the course is hampering their ability to educate their child according to their values: because it is their<\/em> child, and their<\/em> values.<\/p>\n Given that Quebec has also imposed the course on private and home schools – thereby leaving the parents without even the option of escaping the course by withdrawing their child from the public system – it is difficult to see how the Supreme Court arrived at any other conclusion than that the course obviously violates the parents\u2019 rights, regardless of its content.<\/p>\n Let\u2019s be perfectly clear: parents are the first and primary educators of their children, not the state. Period. This principle is the basis of a free and democratic society. Wrest this authority from parents for any reason less grave than serious abuse or neglect, and you have not simply paved the way for tyranny, but you already have a tyranny. For without the right to educate our children as we choose according to the values we choose, what do we have left? State-imposed orthodoxy. Totalitarianism.<\/p>\n The only difference between the totalitarianism of other regimes and the totalitarianism being imposed by the Canadian provinces is that the Canadian breed of totalitarianism is couched in the Orwellian doublespeak of \u201ctolerance,\u201d \u201cmulticulturalism,\u201d and \u201cdiversity.\u201d But simply because the language is new and more soothing does not make the reality any less frightening.<\/p>\n We who have witnessed the slow but steady drumbeat of Canada\u2019s soft tyranny know by now that \u201ctolerance\u201d increasingly applies only to those who hold to the official state-sanctioned opinions, or who remain silent; \u201cmulticulturalism\u201d is only deemed a virtue insofar as the cultures in question jettison any part of their heritage that might be deemed \u201coffensive\u201d; while \u201cdiversity\u201d is mainly a celebration of superficial differences whilst demanding a deeper ideological similitude.<\/p>\n If, as Chesterton says, the family is the ultimate test of freedom, then homeschooling is the ultimate expression of that freedom. For homeschooling is founded on the radical notion that when it comes to the most important things in life \u2013 most especially the raising and educating of children \u2013 it is the common man who is to be trusted, and not the \u201cexpert\u201d or the state. It is not coincidental that this is the same principle that stands at the very root of democracy.<\/p>\n By explicitly targeting homeschoolers, and\/or by explicitly forbidding the right of parental opt-out, the Quebec, Ontario and Alberta governments have played their hand. They have made it clear that they will tolerate no dissent, and that, as the source and symbol of freedom, they fear the family. Perhaps this all sounds eerily familiar. It should, if you have studied any history. Every attempt to create a totalitarian regime begins with this attempt to eradicate, or at the very least mitigate the influence of the family: to tear the roof off the family home and to reach the fingers of the state inside.<\/p>\n Don\u2019t let them do it.<\/p>\n HT: LifeSiteNews<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" by LifeSiteNews Editors – The great English writer G.K. Chesterton once wrote: \u201cThe family is the test of freedom; because the family is the only thing that the free man makes for himself and by himself.\u201d But if what Chesterton says is true, then Canada fails the test, because the Canadian family is no longer … Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":497,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"generate_page_header":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[113,95,142,15],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7293","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-christian-persecution","category-homosexual-indoctrination","category-leftist-tyranny","category-moral-issues"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7293","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/497"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7293"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7293\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7293"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7293"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7293"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}