![\"Obama](\"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/02\/Obama_Abortion_01_175px.jpg\" "\\"Obama_Abortion_01_175px\\"")
by Kathleen Gilbert –\nThe White House announced today that, instead of forcing religious employers to pay for birth control, it will force insurance companies to offer the drugs free of charge to all women, no matter where they work.<\/p>\n
by Kathleen Gilbert –
\nThe White House announced today that, instead of forcing religious employers to pay for birth control, it will force insurance companies to offer the drugs free of charge to all women, no matter where they work.<\/p>\n
The plan, touted as a concession to freedom of religion and conscience, was immediately denounced by pro-life Rep. Chris Smith. \u201cThe so-called new policy is the discredited old policy, dressed up to look like something else, said Smith. It remains a serious violation of religious freedom. Only the most naive or gullible would accept this as a change in policy.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThe White House Fact Sheet is riddled with doublespeak and contradiction,\u201d Smith continued. \u201cIt states, for example, that religious employers \u2018will not\u2019 have to pay for abortion pills, sterilization and contraception, but their \u2018insurance companies\u2019 will. Who pays for the insurance policy? The religious employer.\u201d <\/p>\n
In a statement<\/a> released today, the White House said, \u201cUnder the new policy announced today, women will have free preventive care that includes contraceptive services no matter where she works.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cIf a woman works for religious employers with objections to providing contraceptive services as part of its health plan, the religious employer will not be required to provide contraception coverage but her insurance company will be required to offer contraceptive care free of charge.\u201d<\/p>\n The birth control rule announced last summer was intended to force virtually all employers to cover sterilizations and contraception, including abortifacient drugs such as ella, a sister drug to RU-486. The religious employer exemption essentially applied only to houses of worship, creating an uproar in the Catholic community as hospitals, schools, and charities would have been forced to pay for the drugs. The furor only grew stronger when the administration announced last month that the concerned religious organizations would be given an extra year to comply.<\/p>\n President Obama reiterated the statement in a press conference this afternoon, saying that \u201cthe insurance company, not the hospital, not the charity, will be required to reach out\u201d to women employed by such institutions to offer birth control \u201cwithout copays, without hassles.\u201d<\/p>\n The new rule is reportedly similar to coverage laws in Hawaii that allow employers with religious objections not to directly pay for contraception, but instead to direct employees on how to conveniently access all such drugs and procedures.<\/p>\n In an email to the Weekly Standard, Richard Doerflinger of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops said this week that such an \u201cadjustment\u201d would be not only inadequate, but even worse than the current mandate.<\/p>\n \u201cIt would be no improvement to say: \u2018Sure, you don\u2019t have to include the coverage, you just have to send all your lay employees and women religious to the local Planned Parenthood clinic,\u2019 he wrote.<\/p>\n Eric Scheidler of the Pro-Life Action League also told LifeSiteNews.com that the new rule amounted to a \u201cshell game.\u201d \u201cAt the end of the day, religious employers are still required to provide insurance plans that offer free contraceptives, sterilizations and abortifacients in violation of their moral tenets,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n The country\u2019s Catholic bishops have not yet responded to the White House\u2019s statement. However, both Planned Parenthood and the Catholic Health Association (CHA) have expressed satisfaction<\/a> with the new plan.<\/p>\n The framework developed has responded to the issues we identified that needed to be fixed,\u201d said Sr. Carol Keehan of CHA. Keehan and her organization are perhaps best known for flouting the position of the Catholic bishops during the fight over Obama\u2019s health care reform, throwing their weight behind the bill despite the opposition of the U.S. bishops over concerns the bill would increase abortion funding. Keehan was personally singled out <\/a>by former USCCB President Cardinal Francis George for condemnation for her role in helping pass the health reform law.<\/p>\n Planned Parenthood President Cecile Richards issued a statement, saying: \u201cIn the face of a misleading and outrageous assault on women.s health, the Obama administration has reaffirmed its commitment to ensuring all women will have access to birth control coverage, with no costly co-pays, no additional hurdles, and no matter where they work.<\/p>\n \u201cWe believe the compliance mechanism does not compromise a woman.s ability to access these critical birth control benefits. However we will be vigilant in holding the administration and the institutions accountable for a rigorous, fair and consistent implementation of the policy, which does not compromise the essential principles of access to care.\u201d<\/p>\n The pro-abortion news source, RH Reality Check, lauded the news, noting that the rule is convenient because women would not have to purchase a separate rider for the contraception coverage.<\/p>\n HT: LifeSiteNews<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" by Kathleen Gilbert – The White House announced today that, instead of forcing religious employers to pay for birth control, it will force insurance companies to offer the drugs free of charge to all women, no matter where they work. The plan, touted as a concession to freedom of religion and conscience, was immediately denounced … Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":497,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"generate_page_header":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[85,133,142,23],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7196","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-anti-abortion","category-leftist-hypocrisy","category-leftist-tyranny","category-sanctity-of-life"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7196","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/497"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7196"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7196\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7196"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7196"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7196"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}