{"id":6096,"date":"2011-05-22T19:33:28","date_gmt":"2011-05-23T02:33:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/?p=6096"},"modified":"2011-05-24T13:22:56","modified_gmt":"2011-05-24T20:22:56","slug":"blasphemy-pastor-uses-parable-of-the-sower-to-encourage-abortion","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/2011\/05\/blasphemy-pastor-uses-parable-of-the-sower-to-encourage-abortion\/","title":{"rendered":"Blasphemy: Pastor Uses Parable of the Sower to Encourage Abortion"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_6097\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-6097\" style=\"width: 155px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/05\/Matthew_Westfox_01_165px.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-6097\" title=\"Matthew_Westfox_01_165px\" src=\"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/05\/Matthew_Westfox_01_165px.jpg\" alt=\"Rev. Matthew Westfox\" width=\"165\" height=\"227\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-6097\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Rev. Matthew Westfox<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>by Jennifer Hartline<br \/>\n<em>Anyone unwilling to defend human life from the moment of conception has no pro-life theology.  Rev. Matthew Westfox is stunningly deceived.  His &#8220;reproductive choice&#8221; theology is not remotely pro-life.  He is a mouthpiece for the culture of death. <\/em><\/p>\n<p>After I finished reading Rev. Matthew Westfox&#8217;s article entitled, &#8220;Resurrecting Pro-Life&#8221;, I couldn&#8217;t shake an image in my head of the father of lies smugly patting himself on the back for this one.  A very delicious deception, indeed.<\/p>\n<p>Rev. Westfox begins, <em>&#8220;Christ the Lord is Risen Today&#8221; reminds me that Easter is a celebration of life itself and what Christians honor and revere about life.  Easter reminds me of the respect and reverence for life that is at the core of my theology, that I am in my heart a deeply &#8220;pro-life&#8221; person.&#8221;<\/em><\/p>\n<p>That first paragraph left me with a vague uneasiness in my stomach, and the next paragraph got worse.  A lot worse. <!--more--><\/p>\n<p><em>&#8220;Today most of us won&#8217;t use that term because it has been co-opted  by those who oppose reproductive choice and abortion access.\u00a0 In the  spirit of Easter, I want us to resurrect that term, to re-claim a  pro-life theology that is deeply supportive of reproductive justice.&#8221;<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Westfox,  an ordained minister in the United Church of Christ, serves the  Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice as their Field Services  National Coordinator.\u00a0 A perusal of RCRC&#8217;s website reveals it to be  little more than a pro-abortion platform, complete with all the usual  euphemisms and standard pro-abortion arguments about women&#8217;s health,  safety, and right to &#8220;privacy&#8221; and &#8220;control.&#8221;\u00a0 The site condemns laws  that attempt to restrict abortion, require parental notification, and  the current wave of state efforts to pass Personhood laws.\u00a0 There&#8217;s no  denying their loyalty to abortion.<\/p>\n<p>Continuing on with Westfox&#8217;s article:\u00a0<em> &#8220;To be pro-life, after all, means to honor life and to cherish it.\u00a0 But do we honor life, or do we honor a heartbeat?&#8221;<\/em> And with that, Westfox howls through the last shred of pretense and bares the wolf fangs behind his fluffy wool.<\/p>\n<p><em>&#8220;Life, after all, is the ability to LIVE, to connect with other  human beings, and for Christians, life is among other things the ability  to experience the presence of Christ through those connections.\u00a0 To  live is to use our God-given conscience and power of moral  decision-making.\u00a0 It is to act as a truly free person with control over  one&#8217;s own body, sexuality, and reproduction.&#8221;<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Westfox denies  any inherent value of human life, instead parroting the abortion  rationale that a human being only becomes a person of value after the  select criteria of independence has been achieved.\u00a0 He wraps it in  Christian-speak to make it sound noble and himself credible, but it&#8217;s  the same regurgitated bile so typical of the culture of death.<\/p>\n<p>He  insists that God gives the conscience but not the heartbeat.\u00a0 Whatever  god Westfox preaches, it is not the Living God; not the Incarnate God  who took on human flesh.\u00a0 Was Christ not quite human, not really alive  in Mary&#8217;s womb?<\/p>\n<p>He goes on to twist Jesus&#8217; teaching in the parable of the sower to fit the pro-abortion theology of &#8220;choice.&#8221;\u00a0 He says, <em>&#8220;In  the parable of the sower, Jesus reminds us that seed alone does not  bring about new life &#8211; that all aspects of the conditions into which the  seed are cast must be suitable to sustain life.the story reminds us  that respecting and honoring life means doing all we can to create the  conditions that will allow life to flourish &#8211; while at the same time  respecting and accepting that some conditions are not suitable to  sustaining life.\u00a0 We do no service by trying to force life into places  where the ground is not right.&#8221;<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Westfox is actually saying  we have a duty &#8211; based on Jesus&#8217; teaching about seed falling on good  ground &#8211; to abort all babies who may be born to mothers who are unfit  ground or whose present circumstances are not suitable.\u00a0 To not kill  those babies would be to ignore the lesson Jesus was teaching, and  therefore, to not follow Christ.<\/p>\n<p>He borrows another common  pro-abortion tactic (in which pro-lifers are mocked for supposedly  considering an individual sperm or egg to be a living human being, minus  conception) by equating a new human soul with a seed.\u00a0 He again denies  that God is the Creator and Giver of life by implying that life depends  on the soil and the conditions, rather than having inherent, God-given  value by virtue of being His creation.<\/p>\n<p>He continues, <em>&#8220;Similarly,  living out a pro-life theology means ensuring that those who want to  create new life or parent a child never feel they cannot because the  ground they stand upon is not suitable.\u00a0 It also means that no one  should ever be coerced into bringing new life into a situation they do  not believe is ready to sustain it.&#8221;<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Those who want a child  can go about creating new life themselves, and those who do not want a  child must not be &#8220;coerced&#8221; into bringing new life into the world.\u00a0 When the baby is desired, it&#8217;s  the couple who creates new life; when the baby is unwanted, it&#8217;s the  couple who must not be forced to sustain a life they didn&#8217;t want to  create.\u00a0 In the latter instance, the &#8220;seed&#8221; has fallen on bad ground and  should therefore be destroyed.\u00a0 In both cases, the Author of Life is  not mentioned.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s not life that is sacred to Westfox, but the  power over life and death he believes should rest with each sexually  active person, not with God.\u00a0 His creed is about control, not honoring  life.<\/p>\n<p>Nowhere in Westfox&#8217;s exposition does he acknowledge the  purpose of sex or the obligation to respect its life-giving nature and  the marital relationship for which it was created.\u00a0 He says nothing of  responsibility unless it&#8217;s the responsibility we have to &#8220;not force  life&#8221; into an unsuitable situation.<\/p>\n<p>He states, <em>&#8220;A truly  pro-life theology means working for health care, employment, and other  factors so that no one ever feels he or she cannot be a parent because  the conditions aren&#8217;t suitable and that we never force life into a  situation that lacks one of the most fundamental ingredients of healthy  ground &#8211; parents who are ready to love and welcome the child.&#8221;<\/em><\/p>\n<p>A  convincing deception always contains valid truths, as this one does.\u00a0  Indeed, a truly pro-life theology does include proper health care,  employment, community support, and many other factors.\u00a0 But Westfox  builds his theology on a mirage of sand.\u00a0 He has no foundation because  he denies the inherent dignity of every human being from the moment of  conception.\u00a0 What good are health care and employment if you don&#8217;t first  protect the human person?<\/p>\n<p>Regardless of circumstance, each child  conceived has the right to live and be born.\u00a0 We are the recipients of  each gift of new life; we are not the creators or the judges who can  decide who lives and who must die.<\/p>\n<p>Anyone unwilling to defend  human life from the moment of conception has no pro-life theology.\u00a0  Westfox is stunningly deceived.\u00a0 His &#8220;reproductive choice&#8221; theology is  not remotely pro-life.\u00a0 He is a mouthpiece for the culture of death,  sadly feeding other weak souls this poisonous diet of sophistry.\u00a0 That  he uses the Resurrection and the teachings of Christ to sell his snake  oil is the worst kind of blasphemy.<\/p>\n<p>HT: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.catholic.org\/national\/national_story.php?id=41360\" target=\"_blank\">Catholic Online<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>by Jennifer Hartline Anyone unwilling to defend human life from the moment of conception has no pro-life theology. Rev. Matthew Westfox is stunningly deceived. His &#8220;reproductive choice&#8221; theology is not remotely pro-life. He is a mouthpiece for the culture of death. After I finished reading Rev. Matthew Westfox&#8217;s article entitled, &#8220;Resurrecting Pro-Life&#8221;, I couldn&#8217;t shake &#8230; <a title=\"Blasphemy: Pastor Uses Parable of the Sower to Encourage Abortion\" class=\"read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/2011\/05\/blasphemy-pastor-uses-parable-of-the-sower-to-encourage-abortion\/\" aria-label=\"Read more about Blasphemy: Pastor Uses Parable of the Sower to Encourage Abortion\">Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":497,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"generate_page_header":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[85,84,15,58],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6096","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-anti-abortion","category-defense-of-innocence","category-moral-issues","category-roman-catholic"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6096","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/497"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6096"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6096\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6096"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6096"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6096"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}