New Ledger | by Ben Domenech | 3\/22\/2010<\/p>\n
For as long as the political fight took over the past year, the abbreviated review process on the health care legislation currently pending on President Obama\u2019s desk is unquestionably going to result in some surprises \u2014 as happens with any piece of mashed-up legislation \u2014 both for the congressmen who voted for it and for the American people.<\/p>\n
One such surprise is found on page 158 of the legislation, which appears to create a carveout for senior staff members in the leadership offices and on congressional committees, essentially exempting those senior Democrat staffers who wrote the bill from being forced to purchase health care plans in the same way as other Americans. <\/p>\n
A major story during the course of the health care debate was whether members of Congress would commit to placing themselves in the same health care exchanges as average citizens, or whether they would hang on to their government plans \u2014 that\u2019s why leadership chose to add this portion to the bill, serving as a guarantee that members would participate in the same health plans as the people. Here\u2019s the relevant text:<\/p>\n
(D) MEMBERS OF CONGRESS IN THE EXCHANGE-<\/p>\n
(i) REQUIREMENT- Notwithstanding any other provision of law, after the effective date of this subtitle, the only health plans that the Federal Government may make available to Members of Congress and congressional staff with respect to their service as a Member of Congress or congressional staff shall be health plans that are\u2013<\/p>\n
(I) created under this Act (or an amendment made by this Act); or<\/p>\n
(II) offered through an Exchange established under this Act (or an amendment made by this Act).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
But as with a lot of legislative matters, the devil is in the details \u2014 or in this case, the definitions. As anyone who\u2019s worked on Capitol Hill knows, the personal office staff for a member is governed by different rules than those who work on committees and in the leadership offices. It appears from the way this language is written that those staffers NOT in personal offices, such as those working and paid under the committee structure (such as those working for Chairman Henry Waxman) or those working on leadership staff (such as those working for Speaker Nancy Pelosi) would be exempt from these requirements (emphasis added).<\/p>\n
(ii) DEFINITIONS- In this section:<\/p>\n
(I) MEMBER OF CONGRESS- The term `Member of Congress\u2019 means any member of the House of Representatives or the Senate.<\/p>\n
(II) CONGRESSIONAL STAFF- The term `congressional staff\u2019 means all full-time and part-time employees employed by the official office of a Member of Congress, whether in Washington, DC or outside of Washington, DC.<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Update: Grassley is renewing his push. Here\u2019s a release from yesterday:<\/p>\n
\u201cIt\u2019s pretty unbelievable that the President and his closest advisors remain untouched by the reforms they pushed for the rest of the country. In other words, President Obama\u2019s health care reform won\u2019t apply to President Obama,\u201d Grassley said. \u201cLast December, the effort to apply any new law to administration political leaders was rejected by the Senate Majority Leader. But there\u2019s no justification for the double standard, and I\u2019ll continue to work to establish fairness.\u201d<\/p>\n
The Senate legislation passed last night by the House of Representatives includes an amendment Grassley sponsored and got adopted by the Finance Committee last fall to have members of Congress and their staffs get their health insurance through the same health insurance exchanges where health plans for the general public would be available. During the closed-door negotiations on the bill late last year, the Senate Majority Leader carved out Senate committee and leadership staff from this requirement.<\/p>\n
Subsequently, Grassley and Senator Tom Coburn attempted to offer another amendment to restore the requirement during Senate debate on the health care bill, but the Senate Majority Leader would not let their amendment to fix this loophole even come up for a vote. In addition to Senate committee and leadership staff, the amendment Grassley and Coburn filed during the Senate debate would have made the President, the Vice President, top White House staff and cabinet members all get their health insurance through the newly created exchanges. It would not have applied to federal employees in the civil service.<\/p>\n
Grassley said, \u201cIt\u2019s only fair and logical that top administration officials, who fought so hard for passage of this overhaul of America\u2019s health care system, experience it themselves. If it\u2019s as good as promised, they\u2019ll know it first-hand. If there are problems, they\u2019ll be able to really understand them, as they should.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
HT: New Ledger<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
New Ledger | by Ben Domenech | 3\/22\/2010 For as long as the political fight took over the past year, the abbreviated review process on the health care legislation currently pending on President Obama\u2019s desk is unquestionably going to result in some surprises \u2014 as happens with any piece of mashed-up legislation \u2014 both for … Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":497,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"generate_page_header":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[133,131,94],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4237","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-leftist-hypocrisy","category-obamas-radicals","category-totalitarian-democrats"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4237","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/497"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4237"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4237\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4237"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4237"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4237"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}