{"id":2873,"date":"2008-06-18T08:16:22","date_gmt":"2008-06-18T12:16:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/?p=2873"},"modified":"2008-06-18T13:37:50","modified_gmt":"2008-06-18T17:37:50","slug":"the-skeptical-inquirer","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/2008\/06\/the-skeptical-inquirer\/","title":{"rendered":"The Skeptical Inquirer"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/touchstonemag.com\/archives\/article.php?id=21-05-020-f\" target=\"_blank\">Touchstone<\/a> | Edward Tingley | June, 2008<\/p>\n<p><em>If Only Atheists Were the Skeptics They Think They Are.<\/em>  Unbelievers think that skepticism is their special virtue, the key virtue believers lack. Bolstered by bestselling authors, they see the skeptical and scientific mind as muscular thinking, which the believer has failed to develop. He could bulk up if he wished to, by thinking like a scientist, and wind up at the \u201cagnosticism\u201d of a Dawkins or the atheism of a Dennett\u2014but that is just what he doesn\u2019t want, so at every threat to his commitments he shuns science. <!--more--> <\/p>\n<p>That story is almost exactly the opposite of the truth.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Men of Truth<\/strong><br \/>\nThe story is right about virtue: The smoothly muscled skeptical-scientific mind is a gorgeous thing\u2014picture the Apollo of Olympia, a poised young athlete in a throng of centaurs, passion-driven half-men. Science is a virtue: a perfection of the human creature gifted with a mind, a use of the mind that, says Aquinas, \u201cperfects the speculative intellect for the consideration of truth.\u201d But to be \u201cmen of truth,\u201d in the words of Exodus, is to be vulnerable to truth.<\/p>\n<p>Richard Dawkins speaks as a genuine scientist when he insists, \u201cWhat I care about is what\u2019s true; I want to know, is there a God in the universe or not?\u201d Perfect. Truth is awaiting you, with its painful grip.<\/p>\n<p>But on the question around which Dennett, Dawkins, Hitchens, Harris, Grayling, Onfray, and voices still to come are now springing up\u2014the question of God\u2014the successor of Apollo is not the atheist or the agnostic. Both lack the great virtue of the scientist, the skeptical virtue. Here they are the hankerers after comfort, the scrawny ones who prefer their own commitments over reason.<\/p>\n<p>No matter how excellent these thinkers might be on other questions, on this question they nimbly shift their allegiance: Between the life they like and the demands of vocation (submission to the question), they choose their lives\u2014ironically, the very failing for which they ridicule believers. A seeker of truth has to go where the truth can be found, and to go on until it is found, and both the atheist and the agnostic are early quitters.<\/p>\n<p>Dawkins is right that \u201cthe question of the existence of God or gods, supernatural beings, is a scientific question,\u201d straight from the mind hungry for truth. On that question, the path of the scientist was shown to us at the dawn of modernity by a consummate scientist: Blaise Pascal. Here was a scientific mind that brushed aside the medieval proofs of God (which did nothing for him) to attack the question anew.<\/p>\n<p>[&#8230;]<\/p>\n<p><strong>The Skeptical Theist<\/strong><br \/>\nThere are skeptical theists; Pascal was one. Skepticism and theism go well together. By a \u201cskeptic\u201d I mean a person who believes that in some particular arena of desired knowledge we just cannot have knowledge of the foursquare variety that we get elsewhere, and who sees no reason to bolster that lack with willful belief.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cBelieving is not something you can decide to do as a matter of policy,\u201d as Dawkins says\u2014though it is odd that he does so in a discussion of Pascal, who, like him, is a skeptic. A complete misunderstanding of Pascal, however, is crucial to the way that Dawkins and every one of his fellows (past and future) always think.<\/p>\n<p>Evidence is just not available to demonstrate the existence of God, said Pascal, who called himself one of those creatures who lack the humility that makes a natural believer. In that, he was of our time: We are pretty much all like that now. Three hundred and fifty years ago he laid out our situation for us: Modern man confronts the question of God from the starting point of skepticism, the conviction that there is no conclusive physical or logical evidence that the God of the Bible exists.<\/p>\n<p>. . . <a href=\"http:\/\/touchstonemag.com\/archives\/article.php?id=21-05-020-f\" target=\"_blank\">more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Touchstone | Edward Tingley | June, 2008 If Only Atheists Were the Skeptics They Think They Are. Unbelievers think that skepticism is their special virtue, the key virtue believers lack. Bolstered by bestselling authors, they see the skeptical and scientific mind as muscular thinking, which the believer has failed to develop. He could bulk up &#8230; <a title=\"The Skeptical Inquirer\" class=\"read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/2008\/06\/the-skeptical-inquirer\/\" aria-label=\"Read more about The Skeptical Inquirer\">Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":497,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"generate_page_header":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[68,35,51],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2873","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-christianity","category-philosophy","category-science"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2873","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/497"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2873"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2873\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2873"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2873"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.orthodoxytoday.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2873"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}