Cheering an Islamist victory

Boston Globe | Stephen A. Cook | July 26, 2007

ON SUNDAY, Turks overwhelmingly voted to return the ruling Islamist Justice and Development Party (AKP) to office with 46.6 percent of the vote. Turkey’s two main secular parties did not even come close to this tally, combining for 34 percent of the vote. The stakes in these elections were high, including Turkey’s future democratic development, how religion will be accommodated in an officially secular state, and the prospects for Turkey’s place in Europe and the Middle East. It is for these reasons that Washington should be relieved that Turkey’s Islamists have prevailed. Hardly the firebrands of Hamas and Hezbollah, the leaders of the Justice and Development Party are modernizers who seek a pluralist and democratic Turkey.

Since coming to power in 2002, Justice and Development has done more than any Turkish government to improve and deepen the quality of democracy. To be sure, problems with freedom of expression and individual rights — especially for Turkey’s 14 million Kurds — remain, but Justice and Development has presided over political and economic reforms that strengthened human rights, overhauled the penal code, improved parliamentary oversight, reined in Turkey’s powerful military establishment, and made the Turkish economy the most dynamic in its region. The party will return to parliament with 27 women (more than double any other party) and scores of young, liberal legislators who have joined because they want to live in a democracy.

Conversely, Justice and Development’s vanquished rivals — the Republican People’s Party and the Nationalist Movement Party — are far from paragons of democracy. Both parties have supported the Turkish military’s recent intervention in politics intended to weaken the Justice and Development government and prevent one of its members from becoming Turkey’s next president. Recently, European social democrats accused the leader of the Republican People’s Party of “seeking a Tunisian-type democracy,” which is to say no democracy at all. For its part, the Nationalist Movement Party’s guiding ideology denies the individual and collective rights of Turkey’s Kurdish and other minorities.

The recently published Pew Global Attitudes Survey shows that only 9 percent of Turks approve of the United States. This sentiment is a function of the war in Iraq, which has sowed chaos on Turkey’s border, left Turkey vulnerable to terrorism, and raised the specter of Kurdish independence. The Islamists have trafficked in anti-American rhetoric, yet AKP’s secular counterparts have been no better and often worse than the Islamists when it comes to the United States. For example, the leaders of the Republican People’s Party and Nationalist Movement Party have whipped up anti-American and nationalist sentiment to the extent that large swathes of the Turkish public now identify the United States with the terrorist Kurdistan Worker’s Party, or the PKK, which has been attacking Turkey from bases in northern Iraq. At the funerals for Turkish soldiers killed by the PKK, it has become common for Turks to chant “Down, down PKK; Down, down USA.”

more

Comments

  1. Dean Scourtes says:

    Just as only Nixon could go to China, as the old saying goes, perhaps only Erdogan can lead the Turks towards liberalization and greater integration with the West. One wonders whether the Turkey’s hostility towards the Patriarchate is a fixed and permanent feature, or the result of internal Turkish politics prior to an election.

    Erdogan made some concilliatory comments after the election and American and European leaders ought to use them as an opportunity to try and take the man at his word and press him to relax government pressure on Christian minorities. Working towards a permanent settlement in Cyprus would also be very beneficial in this area.

    America’s war in Iraq is souring US relations with every country in the region, and the Turks are blaming the US for Kudish attacks on Turkish army and police posts. I noticed the Turkish press has taken to referring to their soldiers killed by the Kurds as “martyrs”, which gives you some understanding of their level of emotion on this issue. We need to get the Kurds under control – if for no other reason than that the US military might need to use both Kurdistan and Turkey as an escape route from Iraq if the situuation begins deteriorating.