Blaming America on God’s Behalf — 51 Years Later
Ed. Since we have been discussing Hiroshima and Nagasaki, here is a piece with a different point of view by an Japanese Anglican Bishop who witnessed the bomb.
FrontPageMagazine.com Mark D. Tooley August 8, 2006
The outgoing chief bishop of The Episcopal Church, having presided over that 2 million member denomination’s spiraling schism over homosexuality, squeezed time into his schedule this week for an apologetic visit to Hiroshima.
Presiding Bishop Frank Griswold expressed “repentance” over the U.S. atomic strike on the Japanese city 61 years ago. He is also very worried about current U.S. foreign and military policies, of course.
“I express my own profound sorrow, regret and repentance for the suffering the citizens of this city bore on August 6, 1945, and those in Nagasaki on August 9,” the presiding bishop told worshippers at Hiroshima’s Church of the Resurrection. “I further issue a call to continuing mutual repentance and reconciliation.”
. . . more
Tuesday 08 Aug 2006 | Jacobse | History |
Talk about your cheap grace (from Griswold). The Japanese Bishop on the other hand has a Christian view of the matter. Concerning Griswold, who buys this tripe?
“squeezed time into his schedule this week for an apologetic visit to Hiroshima”
actually it was a year ago in october
tooley couldn’t resist the cheap shot tho
Whenever someone expresses ‘repetence’ or ‘regret’ about our use of the atomic bomb, I remember that the Japanese military attempted a coup to stop Hirohito from surrender. This happened after the bombs were dropped. When you consider the type of mindset behind that action, it becomes clear that a land invasion would mean more loss of life and a prolonged conflict.
You can regret that war is a reality of life, but dropping that bomb saved lives in the long run - specifically, those of our fathers and grandfathers. This also underlines why we want to remain a superpower. Deterrence means stopping the conflict before it happens. That’s a constant from the schoolyard to the security council. Being a superpower is a good thing.
As far as I know Japan has never apologized for the infamous Rape of Nanking, one of worst atrocities of the Second World War.
If Japan will not apologize for this atrocity, we should not feel bound to apologize for trying to prevent Japan from committing others like it.
“tooley couldn’t resist the cheap shot tho”
I wish it were a “cheap shot”. I sorrow for all the Christian’s I knew (as a formal Episcopalian) who suffer under the neo-pagan thought of men like Griswold. I pray we have more and more Tooley’s who point to the sad truth of the apostasy of the what used to be a Church…
Dean,
In 2005 Japan gave a half-hearted apology for Nanking and biological experiments in China. It was given by the Japanese PM but never endorsed by the Japanese Parliament. There were some previous apologies in Singapore.
But truthfully Japan has never dealt completely with their war activities. The primary reason Japan doesn’t make a national formal apology is that in so doing would cost them millions in reparations to victims of their atrocities.